Watching the coverage of the Obama family in the White House, one can’t help but feel a certain media giddiness to be able to report on all these new “firsts.” But to say that this family is the first Black family of an American president is simply wrong.
Before Michelle Obama there was Sally Hemings, who bore the sons and daughters of Thomas Jefferson. I’d like to share an excerpt from my second book edited with Bruce D Baum, Racially Writing the Republic.
****
One of Thomas Jefferson’s more convoluted legacies is the material and cultural capital – including access to racial whiteness – he passed on to Sally Hemings’s children. He freed all of Hemings’s children. Following his promise to Sally that her children would be freed at the age of twenty-one, her oldest children, Beverley (a son) and his sister Harriet, were allowed to leave Monticello in 1822, the year that Harriet turned twenty-one. (Beverley had turned twenty-one two years earlier.) By the terms of Jefferson’s will (he died on July 4, 1826), Madison and Eston Hemings were freed, after ostensibly serving as apprentices until they attained their majority to their uncle, the carpenter Johnny Hemings.At Jefferson’s extraordinary request, the brothers were given permission by the Virginia legislature in 1826 to remain in the state after winning freedom. (An 1806 law had decreed that emancipated slaves otherwise had to leave Virginia within a year.) That the Hemings children’s freedom was tied to their coming of age suggests that Jefferson thought of Sally Hemings as his “substitute wife.” Jefferson freed no other slave in this fashion. Furthermore, Harriet Hemings was the only female slave Jefferson ever freed.
Madison Hemings referred to his parents’ relationship as the “treaty” of Paris – a treaty of sexual commerce – with Jefferson promising lenient, indulging treatment in return for sexual favors. The Hemings children and their descendents gained tangible benefits from this sexual commerce, although until recently this did not include recognition as Jeffersons. As Lucia Stanton explains, “Jefferson gave Madison Hemings what few sons of slave women received – a skilled trade, if not an education, and the freedom to pursue it for his own benefit.”
At the same time, Madison’s children and grandchildren remained in Ohio, where he had moved, and “were bound by the restricted opportunities for blacks at the time.” Meanwhile, Harriet, Beverley, and Eston Hemings passed into the white world. They traded the burdens of hiding the Black side of their family tree for the benefits of racial whiteness. For instance, Eston and his wife Julia moved to Ohio in 1852, passed into whiteness, and changed their family name to Jefferson. Their daughter Anna married and lived as a white woman; their sons Beverly F. Jefferson and John Wayles Jefferson became successful businessmen, and their “grandsons even exceeded the success of [their] sons.”
****
If you want to read more, you need to buy the book, but here’s the question of the week, “Have you ever “passed” for anything? (Straight, wealthy, or even another religion, or race?)

20 comments:
Yes, yes I have.
In fact, I used to do it a lot... it is only now, as an adult fully confident in who I actually am that I don't "pass" anymore.
I do, however, still sometimes subdue who I am. At work, for instance, it would put my job in danger were I to "come out" as a few key things. So I don't.
Which bothers me.... but can't be helped.
As a tall, straight, white, freckled guy... I can't really "pass" as anything else... well, except someone who doesn't despise the person I'm talking to.. lol
I can imagine that it's a terrible thing to try to do. Everything bottle up. Fear of discovery. Tough situation
Every now and again, I pass for myself at work. It is difficult being a Black woman in a predominately white woman career field. I pass as very liberal, always happy, having a White speech pattern, and even as middle class. The truth is I'm not that liberal, not always overjoyed to be around Whites all the time; I prefer Black English, and I fit the script of the Black middle class where every paycheck is revered.
I think it is really significant that you feel compelled to pass for liberal. I have found that there can be repercussions if people don't perceive us as "Left" enough.
Let me correct Professor Harris and the historical record.
The “Sally” story is pure fiction, possibly politics, but certainly not historical fact or science. It reflects a recycled inaccuracy that has metastasized from book to book, over two hundred years. My new book, IN DEFENSE OF THOMAS JEFFERSON (Thomas Dunne Books, 2009), definitively destroys this myth, separating revisionist ideology from accuracy:
•Randolph Jefferson, his younger brother, would have the identical Jefferson Y chromosome as his older brother, Thomas, that matched the DNA. Randolph had a reputation for socializing with Jefferson's slaves and was expected at Monticello approximately nine months before the birth of Eston Hemings, Sally’s son who was the DNA match for a “male Jefferson.”
• The DNA match was to a male son of Sally’s. Randolph had six male sons. Thomas Jefferson had all female children with his beloved wife, Martha, except for a male who died in infancy.
• Until 1976, the oral history of Eston’s family held that they descended from a Jefferson "uncle." Randolph was known at Monticello as "Uncle Randolph."
• Unlike his brother, by taste and training Jefferson was raised as the perfect Virginia gentleman, a man of refinement and intellect. The personality of the man who figures in the Hemings soap opera cannot be attributed to the known nature of Jefferson, and would be preposterously out of character for him.
WILLIAM G. HYLAND JR.
whether Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings children we will definitely not have an answer definitively because we all know Thomas and his wife had no sons. However is it controverted that Sally traveled with Thomas to France and lived there with him during his travels. Is it at all controverted that Sally was his wife's half sister.It does not really matter to African Americans because we know the truth of the enslavers.An those descendants passed for white so who cares,except to spread the truth of ante-bellum United States. In my own family there are many who passed over,not descendants of my grandfather but of his brothers and sisters. Recently we discovered that a descendant of his mothers family passed over in the 20's,initially the white relatives were curious, but then vehemently denied relationship;they later came around a bit because the evidence was irrefutable.I did not cite them to it but if they looked, the census records showed the woman going from black to mullattoe to white over three census periods (30) years.
Hello, I am new to your site and I want to clarify a point. Thomas Jefferson most certainly "DID NOT" ever free Sally Hemmings, through manumission, or the Virgina Legislature, or even through his will. Sally Hemmings was not allowed to leave Monticello until "After" Thomas Jefferson's death, and she was given her time by his daughter, Martha Washington Jefferson Randolph. Please make that correction in your heading as we do not want people thinking that he showed benevolence to Sally at his death. I have done extensive research and reading on my own and it was corroborrated by Issac, Israel and Madison (her son) through their oral histories. I think this is a glaring omission on Mr. Jefferson's part and further clouds the relationship between he and Sally Hemmings. When I read that she was freed by the benevolence of Thomas' daughter and not by the man himself, it led me to wonder how both women felt about the other. Perhaps a kinship from childhood never dissapated, as they were both children when they crossed the Atlantic to Paris, one being slightly older than the other and I am sure a bond grew between the two women, but white women being what they are and a product of their era, once Ms. Randolph achieved a certain maturity and understood what was going on, how could she still have famial feelings towards Ms. Hemmings. However, I was happy she had the presence of mind to free Sally at some point however.
Mr. Hyland in response to your post, you are a liar and a thief. You are a liar because you actually are igonring the work of scientist and dedicated historians to fuel your own racist beliefs and protectionist bias. Yes! I am calling you out. How dare you come to this site and try to piss on the personal histories of a people you know nothing about, or perhaps if you dig hard and long enough, you may just find you are ONE OF US! Ha! Even Dr. Francis Collins of the National Human Genome Insitute at the National Institutes of Health once said, We are a race of 1--the Human Race. But I will dignify your post with actual words from scientist, historians and the Monticello site itself. For the other readers you may want to go there and find a wealth of information or start googling and doing your own research. To somehwat bring balance to Mr. Hylands post. Please read below. It will probably come in several posts as the information brings clarity and you draw your own conclusionsn to his post.
You continue to repeat untruths that have been arranged by you and your followers to try and annailate a people's personal history. To continue to perputrate lies due to racial hatred and degradation for political digressions that youself accuse others of doing. Below is information taken by serious scholars and directly from the Monticello site for those of you who wish a fair and balanced interpretation of the DNA data study.
For purposes of space, I wish to print only facts that will point out Mr. Hylands true motives. However it is lengthy and will require several postings as it is very interesting, but you can find it at the Monticello website and more. However since Mr. Hyland dared to come here and print his lies, we will refute them right here and now.
First here are just a few excerpts from an index of serious research by other writers on this topic. You will find from what I've selected to post, that they did serious research to separate exactly the type of lies Mr. Hyland felt it neccessary to print on this forum. Check it out. Following that will be the conclusions and why they were drawn from the Monticello Foundation on the DNA studies. I just love good intelligent research.
Historians: ignore details of lives of slaves and former slaves, 4, 14,
19, 20-22, 32, 182, 224, 226-28; use of blatantly racist source
material, 13-14; double standards for assessing statements in Hemings
controversy, 29, 34-38, 78-79, 84-98, 103, 223; strategy for dealing
with Hemings allegation, 52, 59, 65, 66, 75-76, 77; character defense of
TJ driven by personal values, 107, 119, 120-21, 127, 131, 147, 157; rely
too heavily on Jefferson family documents, 126-27, 177
Hochman, Stephen A., 8-77
More research:
Hemings, Elizabeth (Betty): mistress of John Wayles, 1, 23, 128,164;
mother of Sally Hemings,1, 23; mother of John Hemings, 23, 50; seen as
reason for TJ's treatment of Sally Hemings's children, 46-47; and Martha
Wayles Jefferson, 128-30; TJ sends word to about James Hemings, 177,
239, 245
Hemings, Beverley, 2, 239; departure from Monticello, 25-26, 33, 36, 58;
Madison Hemings on, 25, 45; chooses to live as a white man, 27,149;
training at Monticello, 40,149,154, 218; violinist, 51; legal whiteness
of, 53-57; TJ does not formally emancipate, 56-57; described as well
known in Charlottesville, 73, 75; as possible "President Tom," 76-77;
ascends balloon, 151-52; conception and birth of, 195; significance of
his full name, 196-198
Dabney, Virginius: as relative of the Jeffersons, the Carrs, and the
Hemingses, 4; writes The Jeferson Scandals to debunk the
Hemings story, 4,14; response to Madison Hemings,14, 20-22; on Edmund
Bacon, 37; supports Ellen Coolidge, 90; cites Samuel Carr as likely
father of the Hemings children, lot; accepts Malone's "character
defense" of TL 107; on possible destruction of TJ's correspondence, 176;
on Hemings's pregnancy upon leaving France, 180, 243
Daily Scioto Gazette, article about Eston Hemings, 15, 16, 18, 149
More research:
evidence of special status, 51-53, 193-94,195, 219; Callender's
hostility toward, 61 62, 63; character of, 64,183; informally freed
after TJ's death, 66; seen as protecting Tom Hemings, 71; bears children
after Callender crisis, 72; TJ at Monticello for conception of children,
80, 84, 99-10l; conceived no children in TJs absence,101-2 2,115-16;
concern about her age at alleged seduction, 111-113, 190;
characterizations of, 113-14; possible answer to TJ's predicament, 118;
and Martha Jefferson, 129,160, 187, 190o,191-92; TJ's racism and,
133-35, 135 37,140-41; appearance of, 135-35, 16o; possible formal
instruction in France,149; implications of relationship with TJ, 157;
historians' reactions to, 158-60; racial classification of, 160; life in
Paris, 163-64; possible identification with TJ's family, 164-65; and TJ
in Paris, 166; nature of feelings for TJ,170,171; receives wages from TL
172-73; boards at Madame Dupri's, 175; few references to in Jefferson
family letters, 177-79; relationship with friends of TJ's daughters,
177; mentioned in memoirs of Monticello, 178; TJ's expenditures on
clothing for, 179; return trip to America, 180-81; linked to Maria
Cosway, 184-85, 185-87, 190, 191, 192-93; attributes that were attractive
to TJ, 186, 189-9o; pattern of conceptions, 195-96; probable given name
of, 196, 239; children's names and, 196-97, 199-200; TJ's failure to
free, 206-9, 222; life after Monticello and death of, 209
More research:
Hemings's departure from Monticello, 31-33; historians deny special
status of, 46-48, 86; possible resemblance to Martha Jefferson, 49,191;
evidence of special status, 51-53, 193-94,195, 219; Callender's
hostility toward, 61 62, 63; character of, 64,183; informally freed
after TJ's death, 66; seen as protecting Tom Hemings, 71; bears children
after Callender crisis, 72; TJ at Monticello for conception of children,
80, 84, 99-10l; conceived no children in TJs absence,101-2 2,115-16;
concern about her age at alleged seduction, 111-113, 190;
characterizations of, 113-14; possible answer to TJ's predicament, 118;
and Martha Jefferson, 129,160, 187, 190o,191-92; TJ's racism and,
133-35, 135 37,140-41; appearance of, 135-35, 16o; possible formal
instruction in France,149; implications of relationship with TJ, 157;
historians' reactions to, 158-60; racial classification of, 160; life in
Paris,
Now from the Monticello site on the DNA studies:
The DNA of Eston Hemings's descendant matched that of Field Jefferson's descendants. (Appendix A , Appendix B, and Appendix J)
This result, now part of the historical record, provides scientific support for the statements of Madison Hemings and Israel Jefferson. While there is a scientific possibility that Randolph Jefferson (Jefferson's brother), one of his sons, or one of Field Jefferson's grandsons, was the father of Eston Hemings, the preponderance of known historical evidence indicates that Thomas Jefferson was his father. Randolph Jefferson and his sons are not known to have been at Monticello at the time of Eston Hemings's conception, nor has anyone, until 1998, ever before publicly suggested them as possible fathers. Field Jefferson's grandsons are unlikely candidates because of their distance from Monticello.
The DNA of John Carr's descendants did not match that of Eston Hemings's descendant. (Appendix A and Appendix B)
Jefferson's grandchildren Thomas Jefferson Randolph and Ellen Coolidge said that Jefferson's Carr nephews were the fathers of the children of Sally Hemings and her sister. The DNA study contradicts these statements in the case of Sally Hemings's last child, Eston. See No. 4 below for reasons to apply this conclusion to Hemings's other known children.
The DNA of Field Jefferson's descendants did not match that of Thomas C. Woodson's descendants. (Appendix K)
The DNA evidence indicates that, despite an enduring oral tradition in the Woodson family, Thomas Jefferson was not the father of Thomas C. Woodson. No documents have yet been found to support the belief that Woodson was Sally Hemings's first child, born soon after her return from France.
Sally Hemings's birth patterns match Thomas Jefferson's Monticello visitation patterns. (Appendix I)
The committee analyzed the timing of Jefferson's well-documented visits to Monticello and the births of Sally Hemings's children. According to this analysis, the observed correlation between Jefferson's presence at Monticello and the conception windows for Hemings's known children is far more likely if Jefferson or someone with an identical pattern of presence at and absence from Monticello was the father. There is no documentary evidence suggesting that Sally Hemings was away from Monticello when Jefferson was there during her conception windows.
More:
V. Assessment of Possible Paternity of Other Jeffersons
One reaction to the DNA study of Jefferson and Hemings descendants has been the accurate observation that the test results only prove that a Jefferson fathered the last of Sally Hemings's children -- not that Thomas Jefferson himself was the father. In order to investigate this possibility, Monticello researchers reviewed Thomas Jefferson's papers as well as Jefferson family genealogies to determine the identities and whereabouts of other male members of his family.
Sally Hemings's confirmed times of conception extend from early December of 1794 through mid-September of 1807. During these eighteen years at least twenty-five adult male descendants of Jefferson's grandfather Thomas Jefferson (1677-1731) lived in Virginia: his younger brother Randolph and five of his sons, as well as one son and eighteen grandsons of his uncle Field Jefferson. Of this total, most were living in the Southside region-over a hundred miles from Monticello -- and do not figure in Jefferson's correspondence or his memoranda.
There remained eight out of the twenty-five for whom age and proximity warranted further documentary investigation. These include Randolph Jefferson and his five sons (Isham, Thomas, Jr., Field, Robert, and Lilburne) as well as two grandsons of Field Jefferson (George and John Garland Jefferson). While each of these individuals had some interaction with Thomas Jefferson and some spent time at or in the vicinity of Monticello, most had no documented presence at Monticello during the times when Sally Hemings conceived her children. Several of them were at Monticello when Thomas Jefferson was absent (Sally Hemings is not known to have conceived in his absences). Randolph Jefferson's sons Thomas, in 1800, and Robert Lewis, in 1807, may well have been at Monticello during the conception periods of Harriet and Eston Hemings. Randolph Jefferson was invited to Monticello during the period of Eston Hemings's conception, but it is not known that he actually made the visit.
The committee concludes that convincing evidence does not exist for the hypothesis that another male Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings's children. In almost two hundred years since the issue first became public, no other Jefferson has ever been referred to as the father; denials of Thomas Jefferson's paternity named the Carr nephews. Furthermore, evidence of the sort of sustained presence necessary to have resulted in the creation of a family of six children is entirely lacking, and even those who denied a relationship never suggested Sally Hemings's children had more than one father. Finally, the historical evidence for Thomas Jefferson's paternity of Eston Hemings and his known siblings overwhelmingly outweighs that for any other Jefferson.
VI. Conclusions
Based on the examination of currently available primary and secondary documentary evidence, the oral histories of descendants of Monticello's African-American community, recent scientific studies, and the guidance of individual members of Monticello's Advisory Committee for the Robert H. Smith International Center for Jefferson Studies and Advisory Committee on African-American Interpretation, the Research Committee has reached the following conclusions:
Dr. Foster's DNA study was conducted in a manner that meets the standards of the scientific community, and its scientific results are valid.
The DNA study, combined with multiple strands of currently available documentary and statistical evidence, indicates a high probability that Thomas Jefferson fathered Eston Hemings, and that he most likely was the father of all six of Sally Hemings's children appearing in Jefferson's records. Those children are Harriet, who died in infancy; Beverly; an unnamed daughter who died in infancy; Harriet; Madison; and Eston.
Many aspects of this likely relationship between Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson are, and may remain, unclear, such as the nature of the relationship, the existence and longevity of Sally Hemings's first child, and the identity of Thomas C. Woodson.
The implications of the relationship between Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson should be explored and used to enrich the understanding and interpretation of Jefferson and the entire Monticello community.
Therefore Mr. Hyland, I can't imagine what your "book" that you are trying to peddle could possibly say or have in terms of histrical and scientific evidence to come close. Therefore how dare you come to this site, a site where the owner said is a site dedicated to African-American history and try to peddle your trash.
You have the audacity to come on this site and "mention" your book? For what reason...that we buy it as fact. Yes, I am calling you out for what you are. Even if someone were to buy into what you call your "research". There are too many indicators that to me proves without a doubt that Thomas Jefferson was a likely progentor of Sally Hemmings children based on irrefutable facts, she was his chambermaid, and what does a "chambermaid" do Mr. Hyland, she takes care of his person and his bedroom. It was pointed out by the overseer that her room was just above his (TJ's) in the eaves...to quote..." a blackend sooted room in the eaves"...was Sally Hemings room. And the oral histories of her children and former slaves. According to Madison Hemings, Ms. Hemings was always in close promixity to Thomas Jefferson. It is unbelievable that after all these years, your twisted little pea brain does not want to accept what we women of color have gone through and known all of our lives. How dare you come to this site with your twisted delusions. I spit on your book.
Mr. Hyland: TRUE DAT!
I also would like to say that perhaps you should read, Harriet Jacobs, Incidents in a Slave Girl's life. There is no doubt in my mind that Thomas Jefferson was a serial rapist of his female slave women and there was nothing they could do about it, but try to free their children through agreements with him. Ms. Jacobs spells it out in terms of horrific slavery was to males and females. She also to my mind dispels the myth of house slaves being treated better than the field slaves. It is a myth. The treatment of both were horrific. The mulatto slaves were probably the house slaves, but they were getting raped and beaten on a regular basis and if the women didn't go along with the program the children of these unions were torn away from them and sold. There is no way in hell that Sally Hemings was "in love" with Thomas Jefferson. For one thing, she was a lot younger than he was. He just took her and used her. And not only that, it didn't just go with her. He started out raping her olde sister and had children by her...Mary Hemings. So do your research and read the slave narratives that you can find on-line. The next time I even hear of someone say that Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings had a love relationship, I will puke. It was not love. It was rape. And she remained in an impossible situation for all her life until after his death. He didn't even have the common decency to free her at his death. She was never freed until his daughter freed her to go and live with her two sons, Madison and Eston.
she was a great women in will always be a hero to me
i think she was raped
Sally Hemings was NOT 'Black'
(or even 'Mulatto) -- but rather --
she had WHITE Skin / GRAY
Eyes / Chestnut BROWN hair;
w/ only 1/4 Black (Quadroon);
lineage -- she actually had
NO 'Black' features at all.
Jefferson 1st began molesting
(raping) Hemings when she was
but only 12 years old (having 1st
began eyeing her when she was
10 years old) and was obsessed
with the fact that she was the
splitting-image of Jefferson's
white dead wife and with the
fact that Hemings was also
the 1/2 sibling of his dead wife.
Jefferson forced Hemings to
spend each night in a 'hidden'
room that was a part of his
bedroom and she could not
leave unless he unlocked it
AND Jefferson NEVER freed
ANY of the offspring he forced
her to have (only allowing
them to 'run away' at age 18
without being hunted down).
Jefferson was nothing
more than a hypocrite;
a child-molester and a
terrorist; this was NOT
a "love story"; Hemings
was NOT a "mistress"
nor was she a "seductress";
AND Hemings was also NOT
'Black' (or even 'Mulatto') -- but
rather -- she was an enslaved
child with White skin who had
a Black grandmother who was a
chattel slave (which meant that
....since chattel-slavery was
'matrilineal' -- Hemings and all
her offspring (no matter their
color or paternity) would also
be seen & treated as 'chattel'
(property) rather than as people.
NOTE:
The ONLY way Hemings
could be seen as being
'Black' would be via the
racist One-Drop Rule (ODR).
(The ODR is a eugenics based
concept that falsely claims that
the Black blood in a Mixed-Race
person's lineage is both 'tainted'
& 'inferior' and 'contaminates' all
of the other bloodlines in their
ancestral lineage -- which,
per the ODR, thus makes the
Mixed-Race person full-Black.
A person's Black bloodlines
are NOT 'inferior' nor 'tainted'
nor a 'contaminant' & anyone
who is NOT a racist should NOT
accept any ideas like the ODR.)
Post a Comment